<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competing From Different Sets of Tees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/</link>
	<description>Northern California Golf Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:03:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>Pat, thank you for your comment.  I am not aware of a specific year when the term &quot;Forward Tees&quot; was first uttered, but it is certainly a by-product of the age of political correctness (and I still don&#039;t think that this term has reached the masses).  I would suspect that the USGA in the late 80&#039;s or early 90&#039;s started recommending its use to get away from the stigma of the term &quot;Ladies&quot; tees.  Obviously there has never been anything preventing a woman playing from the White or Blue tees.  And there shouldn&#039;t have been anything preventing a man playing from the front, but as long as they were referred to as &quot;Ladies&quot; tees, this wasn&#039;t going to happen.  &quot;Red&quot; has inherited some of the negative connotations of &quot;Ladies,&quot; but not nearly to the same extent.  &quot;Forward,&quot; being non-gender specific, was considered the best alternative.  And ever so slowly, more men are playing the shorter tees.  Thanks again - Jim Cowan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, thank you for your comment.  I am not aware of a specific year when the term &#8220;Forward Tees&#8221; was first uttered, but it is certainly a by-product of the age of political correctness (and I still don&#8217;t think that this term has reached the masses).  I would suspect that the USGA in the late 80&#8217;s or early 90&#8217;s started recommending its use to get away from the stigma of the term &#8220;Ladies&#8221; tees.  Obviously there has never been anything preventing a woman playing from the White or Blue tees.  And there shouldn&#8217;t have been anything preventing a man playing from the front, but as long as they were referred to as &#8220;Ladies&#8221; tees, this wasn&#8217;t going to happen.  &#8220;Red&#8221; has inherited some of the negative connotations of &#8220;Ladies,&#8221; but not nearly to the same extent.  &#8220;Forward,&#8221; being non-gender specific, was considered the best alternative.  And ever so slowly, more men are playing the shorter tees.  Thanks again &#8211; Jim Cowan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,
I&#039;m writing an article for the Meadow Club Vista. Can you tell me when &quot;forward&quot; tees came to be and any other information you might have on red tees?
Thank you,
Pat Lyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,<br />
I&#8217;m writing an article for the Meadow Club Vista. Can you tell me when &#8220;forward&#8221; tees came to be and any other information you might have on red tees?<br />
Thank you,<br />
Pat Lyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>Jeff, the designation has been changed.  Thanks - Jim Cowan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, the designation has been changed.  Thanks &#8211; Jim Cowan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>I am provided with a designation for woman&#039;s 18 holes when I post - I am a new member.  I recently played from the Blue tees and could not post according to that handicap / slope index.  Can you help me out and change my designation in the system to a man, so that I can start posting from the back tees when played.

My ghin # 8665899

Thanks for your help...I look forward to posting the score which was a good one on a tough course.

Regards,

Jeff Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am provided with a designation for woman&#8217;s 18 holes when I post &#8211; I am a new member.  I recently played from the Blue tees and could not post according to that handicap / slope index.  Can you help me out and change my designation in the system to a man, so that I can start posting from the back tees when played.</p>
<p>My ghin # 8665899</p>
<p>Thanks for your help&#8230;I look forward to posting the score which was a good one on a tough course.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jeff Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>Ken, thank you for your comment.  The man would adjust his Handicap Index to the Course Handicap Table (Slope Table) for the tees he is playing.  The woman would adjust her Handicap Index to the Course Handicap Table for the tees she is playing.  Once we have these Course Handicaps in hand, we examine the difference in Course Ratings between the two tees.  The golfer playing from the tees with the higher Course Rating receive additional strokes equal to the difference in the Course Ratings (.5 rounds up).  If, after all this, the woman is four strokes lower than the man, she plays as a scratch and the man receives one stroke on the #1, 2, 3 and 4th handicapped hole for men.  The person receiving strokes always receives them according to the ranking of the holes for their gender.  Thanks again - Jim Cowan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, thank you for your comment.  The man would adjust his Handicap Index to the Course Handicap Table (Slope Table) for the tees he is playing.  The woman would adjust her Handicap Index to the Course Handicap Table for the tees she is playing.  Once we have these Course Handicaps in hand, we examine the difference in Course Ratings between the two tees.  The golfer playing from the tees with the higher Course Rating receive additional strokes equal to the difference in the Course Ratings (.5 rounds up).  If, after all this, the woman is four strokes lower than the man, she plays as a scratch and the man receives one stroke on the #1, 2, 3 and 4th handicapped hole for men.  The person receiving strokes always receives them according to the ranking of the holes for their gender.  Thanks again &#8211; Jim Cowan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>What about match play? If a woman play against a man in match play and they play from different tee, how are stroke holes assigned?

let&#039;s say the lady has to give 4 strokes to the male player, in which 4 holes will stroke be given, the tee from which the male player is playing from, or from the tee the lady is playing from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about match play? If a woman play against a man in match play and they play from different tee, how are stroke holes assigned?</p>
<p>let&#8217;s say the lady has to give 4 strokes to the male player, in which 4 holes will stroke be given, the tee from which the male player is playing from, or from the tee the lady is playing from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>Donald, thank you for your comment. You apply your Handicap Index to the Men&#039;s Course Handicap Table (Slope Table) for the Red tees.  Once you have this number in hand, you deduct three strokes since the Course Rating of your tees is 2.8 strokes lower than White. Thanks again - Jim Cowan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald, thank you for your comment. You apply your Handicap Index to the Men&#8217;s Course Handicap Table (Slope Table) for the Red tees.  Once you have this number in hand, you deduct three strokes since the Course Rating of your tees is 2.8 strokes lower than White. Thanks again &#8211; Jim Cowan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald R. Shrank</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald R. Shrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>I am now over 80 years and have just started to play the &quot;Forward&quot; Red/Ladies tees as I no longer have the length to play the whites. I 
compete with others in my senior&#039;s club. Most players play the White tees. The ratings at Shoreline are: white 69.3 &amp; red 66.5 or 2.8 harder from the white. If I follow your comments I figure I should
DEDUCT 3 strokes from the red handicap chart for my index? Some say I 
should deduct 3 stokes from the white chart for my index and some say
I should just use my red handicap for my index. Who&#039;s right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now over 80 years and have just started to play the &#8220;Forward&#8221; Red/Ladies tees as I no longer have the length to play the whites. I<br />
compete with others in my senior&#8217;s club. Most players play the White tees. The ratings at Shoreline are: white 69.3 &amp; red 66.5 or 2.8 harder from the white. If I follow your comments I figure I should<br />
DEDUCT 3 strokes from the red handicap chart for my index? Some say I<br />
should deduct 3 stokes from the white chart for my index and some say<br />
I should just use my red handicap for my index. Who&#8217;s right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>I understand the concepts of the course ratings and making the course handicap index adjustments based on where player&#039;s tee off from.  However, would it be allowed for team players, on the same team, play from different tee&#039;s during a 4 ball tournament? Or even allowable to play from different tee&#039;s when your in a match play event? Doing so, just doesn&#039;t seem equitible, even though the course rating is provided to level the playing field and provide level competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the concepts of the course ratings and making the course handicap index adjustments based on where player&#8217;s tee off from.  However, would it be allowed for team players, on the same team, play from different tee&#8217;s during a 4 ball tournament? Or even allowable to play from different tee&#8217;s when your in a match play event? Doing so, just doesn&#8217;t seem equitible, even though the course rating is provided to level the playing field and provide level competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebacknine.ncga.org/2007/06/18/competing-from-different-sets-of-tees/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Steve, thank you for your comments. In your example the woman would receive one additional stroke based upon the .6 higher rating for her set of tees (23 Course Handicap from the Slope Table plus this one additional stroke means she would play to a 24). In a match play scenario the man would be reduced to a scratch and the woman would receive one stroke on the 11 highest ranked holes for women (the person receiving strokes gets them according to the ranking of the holes for their gender). You are correct in that you do NOT dot the 13 strokes for the man and 24 strokes for women.  The low handicapper always gets reduced to a scratch and the high plays with the remaining strokes. The best way to look at this is in a match between a 17 and 18. Their way would result in the 18 receiving a stroke on the easiest hole on the course. The correct way leaves the 18 receiving a stroke on the most difficult hole . . . just like the Handicap System intended. Thanks again - Jim Cowan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thank you for your comments. In your example the woman would receive one additional stroke based upon the .6 higher rating for her set of tees (23 Course Handicap from the Slope Table plus this one additional stroke means she would play to a 24). In a match play scenario the man would be reduced to a scratch and the woman would receive one stroke on the 11 highest ranked holes for women (the person receiving strokes gets them according to the ranking of the holes for their gender). You are correct in that you do NOT dot the 13 strokes for the man and 24 strokes for women.  The low handicapper always gets reduced to a scratch and the high plays with the remaining strokes. The best way to look at this is in a match between a 17 and 18. Their way would result in the 18 receiving a stroke on the easiest hole on the course. The correct way leaves the 18 receiving a stroke on the most difficult hole . . . just like the Handicap System intended. Thanks again &#8211; Jim Cowan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
